Traditional computer models of winged flight proved incorrect with new experiment

 

Obi_the_parrot

Picture this: A tiny Pacific parrotlet blazing through the
air decked with red-tined pilot goggles, a joint pairing between cuteness and
science that ticks off every box of what makes interesting content. The parrot
in question is Obi, a Pacific parrotlet
recruited by scientists from the California laboratory to study biological
flight dynamics and learn how to innovate
autonomous flying robot design with the help of nature. Obi wears goggles to
protect his eyes as he dashed through water particles illuminated by a laser.

As Obi flaps through the particles, his wings generate
patterns of disruptive waves within the airflow similar to the wakes that swimmers
leave behind in the water. Measuring and analyzing the particle trail provided
an unprecedented level of accuracy into the forces required to keep flyers
afloat and propel them forward that overturned previous understanding of
airflow physics.

Obi helped scientists capture data by flying between two
perches positioned at about three feet apart, through a very fine mist of water
particles measuring “only one micron in diameter,” said study author David
Lentink, an assistant professor of mechanical engineering at Stanford
University. While he flew, a high-speed laser flashing on and off at a rate of
1,000 times per second hit the water droplets and scattered, creating a visible
air pattern which was then captured by a
high-speed camera shooting 1,000 frames per second.

The results showed something unexpected: vortices created by
the initial flapping of Obi’s wings disintegrated almost immediately after two
or three subsequent wing beats—meanwhile computer model predicted that vortices
remain relatively stable for a few seconds once formed.

“We were surprised to find the vortices that are
usually drawn in papers and textbooks as
beautiful donut rings turned out to break up dramatically after two to three
wing beats,” Lentink told Live Science in an email. This means that the flight models used to calculate
an animal’s lift based on the wake it produced, are most likely incorrect.

“Thanks to the high-speed recording, we were able to
capture this and play it back in slow-motion,
so we could see with our eyes how the vortices break up and make it hard for
the models to predict lift well,” Lentink said.

Lentink’s team tested three
additional different models, inserting multiple measurements of the air
patterns from Obi’s flights, and comparing the models’ lift estimate to their
own. Unsurprisingly, none of the models matched the scientists’ calculations.

“Many people look at the results in the
animal flight literature for understanding how robotic wings could be designed better,” Lentink said in a
statement. “Now, we’ve shown that the equations that people have used are
not as reliable as the community hoped they were. We need new studies, new
methods to inform this design process much more reliably.”

Now that scientists understand the there’s no
single model to explain winged flight; they
can begin reassessing what existing knowledge and build updated models. Given
the large degree of animals possessing the ability to fly, it’s likely that
even greater variation exists in models—suggesting that current understanding
is grossly oversimplified. Updating them all could improve the flying robot design.

Source: Livescience